Welcome Guest   Wednesday, August 20th, 2008  
         
Home
Sign In
Exam Calendar
Exam & Study Tips
Text Books Policy
REVIEW MATERIALS & SVCS
2006 Review Notes Bundle
Unbeatable FREE Offer
Practice Exams 06
Practice Problems 06
e-Flash Cards 06
QuestionPacks 06
Accounting Basics
Online Practice Exams
ReadyAccess Formula Sheet
PLACE YOUR ORDER
Order CFA Products Online
Download Order Form PDF
USER MENU
Message Board
FREE Downloads
FREE Online Tools
User Registration
Sign In
Contact Us
GENERAL INFO
Who We Are
How We Can Help You
FAQs
Our Notes Philosophy
Product Availability
Notes Updates

 

Note: When replying to a message or creating a new topic, you will see an editor with text formatting icons after you log on. If you do not see the text editor, please refresh your browser a couple of times until you see one. Otherwise you may post without any text formatting. We find that Arial (2 points) works best. You can also bold, highlight, underline, color etc.


Warning: extract(): First argument should be an array in /home/finsager/public_html/modules/plugins/forums/viewtopic.php on line 6
 Forums : : Multiple violations Post Reply    New Topic
 Posted on Sat Mar 12th, 2005 04:21 pm by raysant

Ethics questions can be very confusing as they may include or exclude information. Information may also be misleading, intended to throw you off the right track. One of the traps is a situation where multiple violations occur. Here is an example:

"John Williams, a portfolio manager, directs his clients' trades towards a brokerage that charges higher commissions, by as much as 50%. However, it has agreed to pay for John's trip to an international trade conference."

In this simple statement, there are several hidden mines. A candidate should ask the following questions:

  1. Did John consult his supervisor before accepting this offer in exchange for higher commission trades?
  2. Since a client's brokerage commission is the client's property, was it used to benefit the client directly?
  3. Did John get the best price and execution for the clients' trades?
  4. Did John reveal the conflict of interest to his clients, i.e., their brokerage was going towards paying for his trip and it may only have a tangential benefit to the client at best?
  5. Did John compromise his independence and objectivity by accepting the expense paid trip?

The following standards are potentially violated under this simple statement:

  1. Standard III C - Disclosure of Conflicts to Employers
  2. Standard IV (A.3) - Independence and Objectivity
  3. Standard IV (B.1) - Fiduciary Duty to Clients
  4. Standard IV (B.7) - Disclosure of Conflicts to Clients and Prospects
  5. Standard III E - Responsibilities of Supervisors, may also have been violated by John's supervisor if there is no policy in place for such offers from third parties. A supervisor's responsibility includes anticipation of violations and their prevention - a proactive role, required for compliance with this standard.

Get a FREE Download of an Ethics Summary File, that is a handy tool for quick reference.

 Forums : : Multiple violations Post Reply    New Topic
 

fscollege

Contents © 2004 finSage Inc. All Rights Reserved.
By using this web site, you agree to these Terms of Use and Privacy Statement.
Web Management Software Provided By
DynaSyn, Inc.

finsage

CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, review, or warrant the accuracy of the products or services offered by finSage Inc. CFA®, and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.